September 27, 2025
There is more true awareness in social media about this terrorism case than in previous cases. That shot surely was fired by a professional soldier or sharpshooter, not Tyler Robinson. The Utah governor broke the news that Tyler Robinson is "not cooperating":
"Charlie Kirk's alleged killer is 'not co-operating' with authorities and has not confessed to carrying out the shooting, Utah's governor Spencer Cox has said." - BBC, September 14.
It's good that he is not cooperating, means he's lucid. His mother and father are like his main accusers. Since he rejected the accusations at the police station, we may wonder how his family, and its retired deputy sheriff friend, got him to go there. Consider how the parents made their accusation (NYT news, emphasis mine):
"... she saw a photograph of the gunman on the news and thought that the image of a slender young man dressed in dark clothes... looked like her 22-year-old son, Tyler Robinson, law-enforcement officials said." "Mr. Robinson's mother showed the photo to her husband, who agreed that the gunman looked like their son."
His father said his son "implied" he was the shooter in a phone call between the two (CNN). Now that Tyler has failed to "cooperate," will the parents still accuse him? Such accusation grounds - looked like, implied - are meaningless, but there's a large cache of "evidence" gathered again against another very young man with no prior criminal record, who was a "stellar student in high school," and who went from "scholarship student to wanted man." (NYT)
Let's look at the evidence against him, which actually exonerates him. We may not agree totally, but we should agree on the main facts.
.- There is a text, allegedly of Robinson, saying that he had hidden the rifle somewhere in the university. That would explain why there's no rifle in the stairway pictures. In the second pictures released, one shows him entering a building - we see the outside area. The first two pictures released look less like Tyler, so to speak (they don't look like him at all to me), and appear to be taken higher up. The second ones show a closer look-alike, but there is no clear shot of his face. I see they're two different men and neither one is Tyler Robinson. In this link, you can zoom these first two pictures. Reporters should ask for more pictures, clearer ones; and the defense lawyer should.
The second released pictures can be seen in this link.
FBI releases new photos of the suspect in Charlie Kirk's shooting.
So, the pictures are not of who they pretend to be (in my eyes), and they're two different impostors. Why not only one impostor for all fake pictures (and videos)? It's a terrorism case, that's why.
One might as well ask why, on 9-11, the second "plane" went through the southern wall without exploding; why or how does it explode, in all videos, only after it is totally inside; also ask why, after it explodes, the plane nose emerges intact through the northern wall before exploding too (I treated this in an article titled "On Terrorism") - and for that matter even ask why it's like nobody notices.
.- The decisive evidence that conclusively proves Tyler Robinson was set up as "the patsy" is the video showing "him" jumping down from the roof as he escapes. In all pictures the culprit goes up the stairway, and someone could say the rifle was waiting upstairs, but there is no justification for the absence of the rifle in the escape video. He left the rifle in the woods nearby, so it has to be seen or noticed in this video. It's not, though.
.- It's a bolt-action Mauser rifle (98 model). He has something that waves in his hand, but we see a light object, not such a rifle. He probably had a plastic in his hand with a black sweater around it.
.- Pointlessly, he allegedly ran away with the rifle to leave it in the wooded area close to the university. If he had no rifle to be seen, he might as well take it with him or throw it away somewhere else. Some could say that the leg started hurting from such a high jump, and that he couldn't carry it anymore, but that's outside the video (which shows no rifle), and this video is finally the most conclusive evidence that Tyler Robinson is innocent of this crime, and therefore just a patsy set up by the perpetrator(s). Determining the perpetrator(s) requires a deep investigation, with access to information, etc., which a private citizen doesn't have. However, based on what is published, one can detect and point to the evil supernatural power behind this terrorism.
.- The video makes it look like it's an easy jump. We have problems with this jump too. The police need to analyze this jump - it's not easy like that.
The bolt-action Mauser rifle, reported to be an "older model," weighs about nine pounds. It's not a foldable rifle; it's not in the backpack. Normally, anyone would throw the rifle down before jumping from a building, to survive the jump. But not the figure in this video. Those who don't own such a rifle may consider a ten-pound dumbbell for comparison. There's no way someone with Tyler's built jumps from that height with a rifle in his right hand, landing and running like in this video. Even without the rifle, it's not doable.
He jumps from the 12th rung of the ladder seen below in the link at the end. To the roof top, it's more than 16 rungs of this fireman's ladder which doesn't reach that high. This lower jumping spot is still a ceiling height. Even from something like 2 meters, you may hurt yourself if you try to land in a squat position like he does.
This unbelievable jump is in fact the stuff of terrorism, and it's a crucial type moment: The authorities must overcome this deception. The deception is the enemy itself. If people in general will swallow impossible facts with their ridiculous scenarios, then they cannot fight terrorism. It cannot be that if the evil is too big you regress into childhood. Someone who didn't make that jump is being blamed for this attack.
Consider the frame of a door. He is jumping from higher than that. Let's not forget, for a second, that this shooter supposedly had a rifle that is about nine pounds heavy with ammunition (chances are a Mauser rifle was not even used).
The lowest point to which his hamstrings reach upon landing is to a "parallel squat" level, as you see at 0.08 in the video below (freezing it), and he's already rising up at 0.09, which is impossible really. The figure doesn't even land in a deep squat position - doesn't fall on the ground as part of landing. The rifle, which he would have in his right hand, doesn't hit the ground; the right hand doesn't even touch the ground. Can Tyler Robinson do this? It lands like a comics figure (superman, spider-man, that kind of thing). He picks up something from the ground, but no rifle.
The figure in this escape video most definitely is not Tyler Robinson. Such a reality determines what is happening in the attack - that it's a terrorist attack again. This video's actual details should be studied and examined well by the FBI (perhaps by some of the other American intelligence agencies too).
What is it if not Tyler Robinson? The case against him falls by its own weight. It could be computer graphics, I suppose (but don't know). It could be directly supernatural evil. It's like the second 9-11 "plane." What is that? Well, it can't be a commercial plane for sure, unless a United Airlines plane can demonstrate that its parts go through concrete and steel walls like the one on 9-11 does in all the videos, whether they are from the TV networks or from others. A real investigation of 9-11 could begin right there (it won't ignore it!); a serious rebuttal may appear funny involuntarily if their scenario is too absurd (I wrote an article, by the way, titled "Book Adventures at eBay," in a light vein).
I say that a human being cannot jump from the height this figure does, landing in a squat position where the butt does not touch the ground. For example, no professional football wide receiver can do that. The New York Times reported that Tyler likes to read comic books and play video games - nobody says he's an athlete. Wouldn't you agree by now that it's 100% sure he is not the jumper in the video?
I described the terrorism "power" in "On Terrorism" as being "hate" itself, as having zero intelligence, thus zero power in reality. If it's a circumscribed power, it's a damned power, which we can notice. Is the supernatural attacker here the same one as the 9-11 attacker (rhetorical question)? Exactly the same one in all such terrorist attacks (I'm not digressing). What seconds 0.08-0.09 show is better appreciated at the lowest playback speed of 0.25.
This impossible jump and the absence of the rifle - the evil deception involved - is additional proof that the attack is coming directly from a supernatural evil enemy. I made this point from confirming what seconds 0.08-0.09 in the FBI-released video shows. It's one of the crucial times where one either overcomes such a deception or succumbs to it. But if one succumbs to it, one should know that it will continue to happen unimpeded.
There is also the good unseen, or none would survive the (damned) enemy. As I said in that article, we have the easy part for this reason, which is to just act or react normally.
It's not normal to accept this video as evidence that Tyler Robinson is the man who killed Mr. Kirk. The experts should consider the mechanics of jumping from so high with any nine-pound object. Would it look like we see in the video when he lands and runs? How would the fall be if he had the nine-pound object in the backpack? The camera shows zooming in this other video.
.- The assassination of President Kennedy and the assassination attempt on President Trump were terrorist attacks too. I wrote two articles about the president's assassination, but only in the second looked for any place to mention it once. If one ponders the reality described in the article "The Silenced Shots - 11/22/63," the nature of the attack shows the enemy as it is. There is also the sign of a supernatural evil in recordings of the Oswald assassination, and in the Zapruder film itself, which I did not cover (I hope to do so in the future).
.- There are other signs of paranormal-supernatural phenomena in the assassination of Charles Kirk: The sound of the shooter's rifle is different in different recordings. Sometimes it's like a "click-clack" type sound, and sometimes, fewer times like a regular rifle sound.
.- In the Butler case, the rifle sound had a similar click-click sound in the live TV recordings, that's different from the regular sound of a rifle (there are three links in the end with these contradictory sounds). I wrote "The Young Man Was 'The Patsy'" (July 20, 2024), and "The Video of James Copenhaver" (August 7, 2024). This is a video that television keeps showing without noticing that the AGR building has been brought right next to the crowd and to Trump, where you can see Trump speaking and also "the shooter" running on the roof in the same video image (I include it in the end too). This and other false video images from Butler are supernatural evil deeds straight from the attacker. James Copenhaver was one of the persons wounded that day, and he filmed the video.
I should add that the way in which the bullet just grazed his ear is a clear sign of the good unseen. For imagine how different the story would have been if the bullet had not grazed his ear. It exposed the assassins so that no one could deny it.
.- We should see how Tyler is right now. He looked fine in the first hearing, but it was done via WebEx, a virtual hearing, and the next one on September 29 will also not be in person, and so we don't get to see him walking, moving so we can evaluate and compare with the video from the house close to his, which shows him limping badly. We see him in the first hearing just sitting down and his legs are not shown. He was read the long list of charges; he was only asked for his name. (Had he been asked if he had anything to say, he might have said he doesn't know why he's there.)
.- Then there's a video that shows him limping in his neighborhood, close to his home (without limping at all, it would be too much for consciousness). We can't recognize who it really is from so far away. It's supposed to be the guy who jumped from the roof without a rifle...
.- They also show from this house a man in shorts and they say it's Robinson. It does not look like him. No zoomed-in image. It would be him by inference, if it's him in the video and in the pictures. Who said first the man in shorts is also Tyler Robinson? This man in shorts also looks different than the men in the pictures.
.- Just a few hours after they released the video, they said the case was being solved, so it was solved by relying on the pictures. By solving it so quickly on that basis, the attention was drawn away from these video details.
.- Screenshots of text message conversations can be easily faked or altered, and in this case there are discernible demonic absurdities where the falsely accused is made to admit everything. I hope the reader visualizes, based on the published facts of the case, the attack we're under.
.- Such a supernatural enemy does not need human help to manipulate computers and cell phones. An investigation should determine how the innocent man was railroaded. The best investigation should determine the extent to which this supernatural enemy acted on its own, and to what extent it received human collaboration, if any.
.- We could say that supernatural, too, is an amazing blindness. It's a problem if a demon hands you a deception like that and you run with it for him. You blame someone innocent then.
.- On September 16, the Director of the FBI, Kash Patel, said they had DNA evidence which in other circumstances would be decisive evidence: "'I can report today that the DNA hits from the towel that was wrapped around the firearm and the DNA on the screwdriver are positively processed for the suspect in custody,' Kash Patel told Fox and Friends." (BBC)
Under these circumstances, this DNA evidence is only a problem. It's not credible when there is evidence like videos and pictures falsely incriminating someone, unquestionably so in the case of the escape video. Why was no DNA found on the rifle, but only on the towel and a screwdriver? Could it be that these were stolen? But these questions are secondary. Once they see the terrorism/terrorist attack in the fake escape video, they need to go after it, not Tyler anymore.
.- if someone says the video of the limping man (close to his house) looks like he's acting, I agree. That's an actor. The figure who stayed on his feet upon landing from so high would not be limping like that later. If he's still limping in court, I would have to reassess (go figure); but, as I said, the first hearing was a WebEx hearing and the next one will also be. Let us see Tyler Robinson walking.
It's good that many people notice that there's no rifle in all the graphic evidence. With such an escape video, not even if he says he did it is it true. He should then be asked, "Where's the rifle in this video?" Given the importance of the case, he should be asked to jump again, so we can believe him.
Charles was one of "the people," so American. He must have been very good to draw an attack from such an enemy. The U.S. government has a responsibility to him still. It should not be helping to frame "the patsy" figure. It has a responsibility for Tyler Robinson just as much. It exists for them...
See 1:27 or 2:27 for the ladder to the jump-off point.
A video with two entirely different audio sounds for the same shot.
See here.
This video to compare the rifle used in Orem with that in Butler.
The rifle sound in Butler.
The AGR building right behind the crowd and this close to Trump (starting at 1:22).
