July 20, 2024
Besides not being able to kill the president, the other thing that went very wrong for the killers is that the young man did not climb to the highest point of the roof as he would have had to do for the present narrative to have a basis. At the spot in which the young man died, he was in fact distant from the uppermost point of the roof and unable to even see the campaign rally. He would have had to climb to the very top, to the apex of the roof, since only from that point would he have been able to see the political rally and aim like the assassins did.
Watching the video of the "shooter" moving on the roof, published by The New York Times on 7/17/24, it does not appear he had a rifle. This not just because we don't see it, but also from the way he climbed. We don't see the rifle either in witness video images or in the picture of him dead, but the crucial fact is that even if a video or a picture were to appear showing him with a rifle on the roof, he still could not be the real assassin because he never reached high enough in the roof to be able to be the shooter.
He crawled up the roof very slowly, as if nobody could see him, and then just stopped at the spot where we see him dead. He stopped yards/meters short of the uppermost point of the roof. From the spot he was killed, he could only hear the noise of the campaign rally but not see anything other than the roof, the sky beyond, or people to his right.
We can see how The New York Times circled the location of the "gunman's body" (fourth link), and that it's where we also see him in a picture. It's evident he stopped his ascent far from the uppermost point he needed to reach. From the roof, he never saw the stage, the crowd - nothing there.
The bullet that slightly wounded the former president exposed the intent of the assassins beyond question, as does also the fact that the young man stopped crawling about half-way up the roof, where he could only hear but not see the rally. It follows that the shooters didn't wait for him to reach the spot from where he could be in position to shoot (and be the killer theoretically), and that they started shooting and missing with their shots, apparently in a state of nervousness and pressured by time due to the witnesses who could see the young man.
A witness reported seeing him climb up with a rifle clearly visible to him, but the video (first link) does not show that at all and his movement wasn't like that of someone carrying a rifle. There's also the late story that some agent went up a ladder to the roof and the young man saw him and "pointed his rifle" at him, which made him go back down seeking protection, but that he sure saw the rifle. I don't believe it. The unseen rifle loses its significance once we know that the young man could not even look to the other side from the spot he was killed at.
We see the young man in the video climbing too slowly, too tentatively. It almost looks like he might not reach the top, and the evidence now is clear on this fact: He did not reach the apex of the roof. From seeing the spot in which he was killed, we learn that he was "the patsy" not the assassin.
When we see the picture of him already dead, we again note that he stopped climbing yards short of the roof's uppermost point. In the second link, at its start, you can see a vertical object on the right side of the roof, and that's the apex level of the roof - the height level at which he would have had to be killed for the accepted narrative to make any sense. His dead body would have been located at the highest point of the roof - but it was not. We can all see that he died yards/meters below the point he needed to reach to look to the other side, etc. We can see in the second link that he did not ascend much more than he had in the video released by the NYT.
This is a young person who reportedly asked for permission at his job to be absent on just this day. Why would he ask his boss for just one day's permission to go do what he is accused of? Someone who went without a rifle might, or one who thinks he can come back to work. Good that the images available make us witnesses too.
Thus, someone else tried to kill the president and make the young man guilty of it. He was also a kid at twenty years of age. The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) published the following key things about this young man:
"In his well-to-do hometown, however, neighbours are in shock, seemingly unable to grasp how a quiet young man is now accused in the shooting."
"He was from Bethel Park in Pennsylvania, about 70km (43 miles) from the site of the attempted assassination, and graduated in 2022 from Bethel Park High School with a $500 (£385) prize for maths and science, according to a local newspaper."
"Crooks worked in a local nursing home kitchen just a short drive away from his home, where staff members have said that he passed a background check and raised no concerns."
"The Community College of Allegheny, or CCAC, has confirmed that Crooks attended the school between September 2021 and May 2024. He graduated with an associate degree in engineering science."
"In a statement sent to the BBC, the college noted that he graduated"with high honours"and that a review of his records turned up no disciplinary, student conduct or security-related incidents."
"Speaking to CNN, Crooks' father, Matthew Crooks, said he was trying to figure out"what the hell is going on"but would"wait until I talk to law enforcement"before speaking about his son." (7/17/24)
He exposed the terrorists by not reaching the point the deception required. By stopping his climb where he did, the whole deception was/is fully exposed. The BBC report shows a promising young man, rather. It looks like the investigators should check for the possibility of shooters in the trees seen in the video published by the NYT (link 1).
There are news reports that he "hid the weapon in advance, according to a Secret Service source" (FOX 2 Detroit). It was "not immediately clear where he hid it, however." It's clear he would have had to hide it close to the roof (in the roof?). They say he was seen holding a "range finder." He could not forget that again, but, in the context of the thoughtless narrative, he might as well have.
Link 1: "Bystanders Warned Law Enforcement of the Gunman Two Minutes Before He Began Shooting, Video Shows"
Link 2: "Videos Show Suspect Lying Motionless on Nearby Rooftop After Shooting"
Link 3: "What we know about the Trump attacker" - BBC
Link 4: Here you see where the NYT locates the body of the dead gunman.
"A Visual Timeline of the Trump Rally Shooting"