16/10/2020 strategic-culture.org  18min 🇬🇧 #180488

 La corruption des Biden

Before the Bidens 'Did' Ukraine, There Was Iraq - and Serbia

James George Jatras

The United States approaches the November 2020 election with growing apprehension, even dread.

Among the possibilities:

For those who have followed events outside the United States during the past few decades, much of this sounds familiar. We've seen it before - inflicted on other countries.

Now It's Coming Home to the U.S.

 As explained by Revolver News, what happens in America next to a great extent may be a form of blowback from a specific event: the U.S.-supported 2014 regime change operation in Ukraine:

'A "Color Revolution" in this context refers to a specific type of coordinated attack that the United States government has been known to deploy against foreign regimes, particularly in Eastern Europe deemed to be "authoritarian" and hostile to American interests. Rather than using a direct military intervention to effect regime change as in Iraq, Color Revolutions attack a foreign regime by contesting its electoral legitimacy, organizing mass protests and acts of civil disobedience, and leveraging media contacts to ensure favorable coverage to their agenda in the Western press.

'It would be disturbing enough to note a coordinated effort to use these exact same strategies and tactics domestically to undermine or overthrow President Trump. The ominous nature of what we see unfolding before us only truly hits home when one realizes that the people who specialize in these Color Revolution regime change operations overseas are, literally, the very same people attempting to overthrow Trump by using the very same playbook. Given that the most famous Color Revolution was the [2004] "Orange Revolution" in the Ukraine, and that Black Lives Matter is being used as a key component of the domestic Color Revolution against Trump, we can encapsulate our thesis at Revolver with the simple remark that "Black is the New Orange."'

This hardly should come as a surprise. The same government agencies and their corporate, NGO, and think tank cronies that are now weaponizing Black Lives Matter, Antifa, other Wokesters, and  military putsch plotters here at home to remove Trump have turned regime change abroad into an art form. Ukraine was one of their signal successes, featuring a cast of  characters later key to the failed "Ukrainegate" impeachment.

Another consequence of regime change: corruption. As the old saying goes, any idiot can turn an aquarium into fish soup, but no one has yet figured out how to reverse the process. Once a country gets broken it tends to stay broken, whether the "breaking" is accomplished by military means (Serbia 1999, Iraq 2003, Libya 2011) or by a color revolution from the streets (Serbia 2000, Georgia 2003, Ukraine 2004-2005 and again in 2014, Kyrgyzstan 2005, Lebanon 2005, Armenia 2018, plus many others of varying degrees of success, and failures in Iran, Russia, Venezuela, China (Hong Kong), and Belarus). With the target nation's institutions in shambles, the dregs take over - in Libya, for example, even to the point of reintroducing  trade in sub-Saharan African slaves, whose black lives evidently don't matter to anyone at all.

Iraq: Crush, Corrupt, Cash In

Finally, once regime change occurs and corruption is rampant, another shoe drops: foreign vultures descend on the carcass, profiteers who in many cases are the very same people that helped to create the chaos on which they are cashing in. Invariably, these carpetbaggers are well-connected individuals in the aggressor states and organizations positioned on the inside track both for the carve-up of the target country's resources and (the word "hypocrisy" doesn't begin to describe it) for funds to implement "reform" and "reconstruction" of the devastated target.

The showcase of this scam, pursuant to Colin Powell's reported "Pottery Barn Rule" ( You break it, you own it) was the money ostensibly spent on rebuilding Iraq, despite assurances from the war's advocates that it would pay for itself. With the formal costs conservatively set at over $60 billion to  $138 billion out of a tab for the war of over  two trillion dollars, the lion's share of it went to U.S. and other vendors, including the notorious $1.4 billion no-bid contract to Halliburton subsidiary KBR, of which then-Vice President Dick Cheney, a major proponent of the war, had been a top executive. (" Rand Paul Says Dick Cheney Pushed for the Iraq War So Halliburton Would Profit.")

In Ukraine, Biden's Son Also Rises

The predatory cronyism vignette most pertinent to the Black/Orange regime change op now unfolding before us with the intent of installing Joe Biden in the Oval Office is that of his son, Hunter, and a Ukrainian energy company with a sketchy reputation, Burisma Holdings. (Right at the outset, even some of Hunter's associates  though the gig with Burisma was too "toxic" and broke off ties with him.) Though ignored or dismissed as fake news and a conspiracy theory by Democrats and legacy media (or do I repeat myself?), the facts are well enough known and fit the Iraq pattern to a T: then-Vice President Joe Biden pushed for regime change in Ukraine, which succeeded in February 2014 with the ouster of the constitutionally elected president, Viktor Yanukovych.  In April 2014, Joe Biden's son, Hunter, was brought onto Burisma's board (along with a fellow named  Devon Archer, later convicted of unrelated fraud) at an exorbitant level of compensation that made little sense in light of Hunter's nonexistent expertise in the energy business - but which made plenty of sense given that his dad was not only Veep but the Obama administration's point man on policy toward Ukraine, including foreign assistance money. [NOTE: It now has come out that  in 2015 Hunter put his dad, the U.S. Vice President, in direct contact with Burisma, news the giant tech firms sought to suppress on social media].

When a troublesome  Ukrainian prosecutor named Viktor Shokin seemed to be taking too much interest in Burisma, Papa Joe came to the rescue, openly threatening the western-dependent politicians installed after Ukraine's 2014 color revolution with withholding of a billion dollars in U.S. aid until Shokin, whom Joe unironically alleged to be "corrupt," got the heave-ho. As empty from Burisma's  Clinton-connected PR firm, Blue Star Strategies, to Hunter to lobby his dad to get Shokin off their back. Joe did just what was asked.  He later bragged: "I said, 'You're not getting the billion. I'm going to be leaving here [i.e., Kiev] in, I think it was about six hours.'I looked at them and said, 'I'm leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money.'Well, son of a bitch. He got fired."

But First There Was Serbia

Today many people remember Iraq, some have a clue about Ukraine. But Serbia, which preceded them, is off the radar screen of most Americans. To recap:

As a Senator in the 1990s, Joe Biden was one of the most militant advocates of U.S. military action against Serbs during the breakup of the Yugoslav federation, first in Croatia (1991-95), then in Bosnia (1992-95), and then in Serbia's province of Kosovo (1998- 1999). (As has been said about others like Hillary Clinton and the late John McCain, Biden evidently has never met a war he didn't like. Along with Hillary, in 2003 Biden helped to whip Senate Democrat votes for the Bush-Cheney Iraq war.) Channeling McCain Sings "Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran" , Biden continually called for the U.S. to bomb, bomb, bomb bomb the Serbs while (in a foreshadowing of the Obama-Biden administration's support for jihad terrorists in Libya and Syria,  which ultimately resulted in the appearance of ISIS) pushed successfully for sending weapons to the Islamist regime in Bosnia and then for the U.S. to arm the  Islamo-narco-terrorist group known as the "Kosovo Liberation Army" (KLA).

Joe Biden was the  primary sponsor of the March 1999 Kosovo war authorization for military action against Serbia and Montenegro, S. Con. Res. 21. (As a little remembered historical note, Biden's resolution might be seen as the last nail in the coffin of Congress's constitutional war power. While S. Con. Res 21 passed the Senate,  it failed in the House on a 213-213 tie vote, with Republicans overwhelmingly voting Nay. It didn't matter. Bill Clinton, reeling from the Lewinsky scandal, went ahead with the bombing campaign anyway.) The ensuing 78-day NATO air operation had little impact on Serbia's military but devastated the country's infrastructure and took hundreds of civilian lives. (Even now, more than 20 years later, Serbia suffers from  elevated cancer levels attributed to depleted uranium munitions.) But for Joe Biden Accidentally Calls for Jihad against America (David Wood) even that wasn't punishment enough for people he collectively demonized as " illiterate degenerates, baby killers, butchers, and rapists." In May 1999, at the height of the NATO air assault, he called for the introduction of  U.S. ground troops ("we should announce there's going to be American casualties") followed by "a Japanese-German style occupation."

Eventually the bombing stopped in June 1999 when then-Serbian strongman Slobodan Milošević acceded to temporary international occupation of Kosovo on the condition that the province would remain part of Serbia, as codified in United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244. It was a promise the U.S. and NATO, not to mention their European Union (EU) concubine, had no intention of keeping. Under the nose of the NATO occupation, ostensibly demobilized  KLA thugs were given virtually free rein to terrorize the Serbian population, two-thirds of whom were driven out along with Jews and Roma, the rest sheltering in enclaves where they remain to this day. Orthodox Christian churches and monasteries, many of them centuries old, were particular targets for destruction and desecration. KLA commanders - who were also kingpins in the Kosovo Albanian mafia dealing in  sex slaves, drugs, weapons, and even human organs - were handed local administration.

In 2007  Senator Biden praised the new order as a "victory for Muslim democracy" and "a much-needed example of a successful U.S.-Muslim partnership." A year later, the Bush administration sought to complete the job by ramming through Kosovo's independence in barefaced violation of UNSCR 1244 and despite strong Russian objections. But instead of resolving anything the result was a frozen conflict that persists today, with about half of the United Nations'member states recognizing Kosovo and half not. Touting itself as the  most pro-American "country" sic in the world, the Kosovo pseudo-state became a prime recruiting ground for ISIS.

But hey, business was good! Just as in Iraq, the politically well-connected, including former officials instrumental in the attack on Serbia and occupying Kosovo, flocked to the province fueled by lavish aid subsidies from the U.S. and the EU, which for a while made Kosovo one of the biggest per capita foreign assistance recipient "countries" in the world. One such vulture - sorry,  entrepreneur - was former Secretary of State Madeleine Madeleine Albright - The deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children was worth it. Albright, a prominent driver of the Clinton administration's hostile policy on top of Madeleine Albright in Prague: "Disgusting Serbs!"Madeleine Albright in Prague: "Disgusting Serbs!" . Albright sought to cash in to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars on sale of the mobile telephone company PTK, originally a Yugoslav state-owned firm that was "privatized" (i.e., stolen) in 2005 as a joint stock company, but who later dropped her bid when it attracted unwanted publicity. Also in the hunt for Kosovo riches was former NATO Supreme Commander and operational chief of the Kosovo war  General Wesley Clark, who reportedly cornered a major share of the occupied province's coal resources under a sweetheart deal that seems to have vanished from public scrutiny since first reported in 2016.

At the moment there seems to be no smoking gun of a direct Biden family payout, à la Ukraine, but there is a possible trail via Hunter's Burisma-buddy Devon Archer and  Archer's fellow-defendant John "Yanni" Galanis, who in turn is connected to top Kosovo Albanian politicians. In any case, the Biden clan seems to have paid a lot of attention to Kosovo for not having skin in the game. Joe's late son and Delaware Attorney General, Beau, worked in Kosovo following the war to train local prosecutors as part of an OSCE (Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe) "rule of law" mission (admittedly a big task in a mafia-run pseudo-state),  for which a road was named after him near the massive U.S. base Camp Bondsteel. With Hunter on hand for the naming ceremony, Joe Biden took the  opportunity to express his "condolences" to Serbian families who lost loved ones in the NATO air assault - of which he was a primary advocate.

A 'Shokin'Demand 

Perhaps the best parallel between Biden's handiwork in Ukraine and his interest in Kosovo also relates to getting rid of an inconvenient individual. But in this case, the person in question wasn't a state official like Burisma prosecutor Viktor Shokin but a hierarch of the Serbian Orthodox Church.

In May 2009 Vice President Biden insisted on visiting one of Kosovo's most venerable Serbian Orthodox Christian sites,  the Visoki Dečani monastery. Ruling Bishop Artemije of the Eparchy of Raška and Prizren, which includes Kosovo and Metohija, refused to give his blessing for the visit, in effect telling Biden he was not welcome. Bishop Artemije long had been a bane of Biden and others advocating detachment of Kosovo from Serbia, starting with his first mission to Washington in 1997 as war clouds gathered. In 2004 Bishop Artemije  sued the NATO powers in the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg following their inaction to protect his flock during an  anti-Serbian rampage by Muslim Albanian militants in March of that year. Then, in March 2006, as preparations were underway for a "final solution" to the Kosovo issue, Bishop Artemije launched an intensive multinational lobbying and public relations effort (in which Yours Truly  was the lead professional) to try to derail the U.S. policy to which Biden had devoted so much attention. While the Bishop's campaign was unsuccessful in reversing U.S. policy it was instrumental in delaying it for over a year - to  howls of outrage from yahoogroups.com/msg09759.html_0_180488');"> yahoogroups.com/msg09759.html">Biden's associates in Washington. Thus, for Biden, the monastery visit snub by Bishop Artemije was adding insult to injury.

The end for Bishop Artemije came a few months later, at the beginning of 2010 at the time of two visits to Kosovo by U.S. Admiral Mark P. Fitzgerald, then Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Europe and Africa, and Commander, Allied Joint Force Command (JFC) Naples, (who retired later that year, becoming, unsurprisingly, a consultant " with numerous defense and commercial maritime and aviation contractors"). At that time, an unconfirmed report indicated that a high NATO officer (whether Admiral Fitzgerald or someone else is not specified) stated in the course of one of his local meetings (this is verbatim or a close paraphrase): "What we need here is a more cooperative bishop." (More details are available  here. Since that posting last year the  NATO command in Naples seems to have scrubbed the items about Fitzgerald's 2010 visits from their site.)

Shortly afterwards, Biden's troublesome priest was forcibly removed by police and exiled from his see, without ecclesiastical trial, by Church authorities in Belgrade under pressure from compliant Serbian politicians installed after the October 2000 color revolution, in turn pressured by NATO. The pretext? Transparently baseless charges of financial wrongdoing. In other words, bogus accusations of "corruption" - like against Ukraine's Shokin.

One could almost hear Joe Biden chortle: "Well, son of a bitch. He got fired."

But Look at the Bright Side...

Back to the incipient coup facing the United States, there should be no illusion that what's at stake in the unfolding scenario for the removal of Donald Trump is  not just his presidency but the survival of James Jatras: “Does America Have a Future? Options Before a Declining Hegemon” of which he is seen as an avatar by both his supporters and detractors. Remember, we're dealing with predators and scavengers who are happy to  burn the old, evil America down as long as they can achieve total power and continue to feather their cushy nests. Short of a blowout Trump victory by a margin too big to hijack, we're headed for a dystopian state of affairs.

If they do manage to remove Trump, " by any means necessary," and Joe Biden takes the helm, we can anticipate  a bevy of globalist warmonger appointees that make Trump's team look like disciples of Mahatma Gandhi. Among the names floated like  Nicholas Burns,  Antony Blinken,  Michele Flournoy,  Evelyn Farkas, and  Anne-Marie Slaughter, all were on board with Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq, Libya, Ukraine, Syria... [NOTE: The Atlantic Council, known as NATO's semi-official think tank in Washington and which will be instrumental in staffing a future Joe Biden administration, also has been the beneficiary of  generous donations from Hunter Biden's paymaster, Burisma].

It's a recipe for wars, regime changes, and color revolutions galore.

But to finish on a positive note, the potential future business opportunities will be endless!

 strategic-culture.org