26/12/2022 consortiumnews.com  13 min 🇬🇧 #221398

Zelensky à Washington : les livraisons d'armes à Kiev «aggraveront le conflit», prévient Moscou

Chris Hedges: Democrats Now the War Party

The Democratic Party has become the party of permanent war, fueling massive military spending which is hollowing out the country from the inside and flirting with nuclear war.

Volodymyr Zelensky and Nancy Pelosi during a Joint Meeting of Congress last Wednesday with flag of Ukraine signed by the Ukrainian soldiers fighting at Bakhmut. (Office of the House Speaker)

By  Chris Hedges
 ScheerPost

Democrats position themselves as the party of virtue, cloaking their support for the war industry in moral language stretching back to Korea and Vietnam, when President  Ngo Dinh Diem was as lionized as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

All the wars they support and fund are "good" wars. All the enemies they fight, the latest being Russia's Vladimir Putin and China's Xi Jinping, are incarnations of evil. The photo of a beaming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Vice President Kamala Harris holding up a signed Ukrainian battle flag behind Zelensky as he addressed Congress last Wednesday was another example of the Democratic Party's abject subservience to the war machine.

The Democrats, especially with the presidency of Bill Clinton, became shills not only for corporate America but for the weapons manufacturers and the Pentagon. No weapons system is too costly. No war, no matter how disastrous, goes unfunded. No military budget is too big, including the $858 billion in military spending allocated for the current fiscal year, an  increase of $45 billion above what the Biden administration requested.

The historian  Arnold Toynbee cited unchecked militarism as the fatal disease of empires,  global.oup.com arguing that they ultimately commit suicide.

There once was a wing of the Democratic Party that questioned and stood up to the war industry: Senators J. William Fulbright, George McGovern, Gene McCarthy, Mike Gravel, William Proxmire and House member Dennis Kucinich. But that opposition evaporated along with the antiwar movement.

When 30 members of the party's progressive caucus recently issued a call for Biden to negotiate with Putin, they were forced by the party leadership and a warmongering media to back down and  rescind their letter. Not that any of them, with the  exception of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have voted against the billions of dollars in weaponry sent to Ukraine or the bloated military budget. Rashida Tlaib  voted present.

The  opposition to the perpetual funding of the war in Ukraine has come primarily from Republicans, 11 in the Senate and 57 in the House, several,  such as Marjorie Taylor Greene, unhinged conspiracy theorists. Only nine Republicans in the House  joined the Democrats in supporting the $1.7 trillion spending bill needed to prevent the government from shutting down, which included approval of $847 billion for the military.

The total is  boosted to $858 billion when factoring in accounts that don't fall under the Armed Services committees' jurisdiction. In the Senate, 29 Republicans  opposed the spending bill. The Democrats,  including nearly all 100 members of the House Congressional Progressive Caucus, lined up dutifully for endless war.

This lust for war is dangerous, pushing us into a  potential war with Russia and,  perhaps later, with China - each a nuclear power. It is also economically ruinous. The monopolization of capital by the military has driven U.S. debt to  over $30 trillion, $6 trillion more than the U.S. GDP of $24 trillion. Servicing this debt costs $300 billion a year.

The U.S. spends more on the military than the next nine countries, including China and Russia, combined. Congress is also on track to provide an extra $21.7 billion to the Pentagon - above the already expanded annual budget - to resupply Ukraine.

"But those contracts are just the leading edge of what is shaping up to be a big new defense buildup," The New York Times  reported. "Military spending next year is on track to reach its highest level in inflation-adjusted terms since the peaks in the costs of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars between 2008 and 2011, and the second highest in inflation-adjusted terms since World War II - a level that is more than the budgets for the next 10 largest cabinet agencies combined."

Senators J. William Fulbright and Eugene McCarthy, 1966. (White House Photo)

Surrender

The Democratic Party, which, under the Clinton administration aggressively courted corporate donors, has surrendered its willingness to challenge, however tepidly, the war industry.

"As soon as the Democratic Party made a determination, it could have been 35 or 40 years ago, that they were going to take corporate contributions, that wiped out any distinction between the two parties," Dennis Kucinich said when I  interviewed him on my show for  The Real News Network. "Because in Washington, he or she who pays the piper plays the tune. That's what's happened. There isn't that much of a difference in terms of the two parties when it comes to war."

In his 1970 book The Pentagon Propaganda Machine, Fulbright describes how the Pentagon and the arms industry pour millions into shaping public opinion through public relations campaigns, Defense Department films, control over Hollywood and domination of the commercial media. Military analysts on cable news are universally former military and intelligence officials who  sit on boards or work as consultants to defense industries, a fact they rarely disclose to the public.

Barry R. McCaffrey, a retired four-star army general and military analyst for NBC News, was also an employee of Defense Solutions, a military sales and project management firm. He,  like most of these shills for war, personally  profited from the sales of the weapons systems and expansion of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

On the eve of every congressional vote on the Pentagon budget, lobbyists from businesses tied to the war industry meet with Congress members and their staff to push them to vote for the budget to protect jobs in their district or state. This pressure, coupled with the mantra amplified by the media that opposition to profligate war funding is unpatriotic, keeps elected officials in bondage. These politicians also depend on the lavish donations from the weapons manufacturers to fund their campaigns.

Seymour Melman, in his book Pentagon Capitalism, documented the way militarized societies destroy their domestic economies. Billions are spent on the research and development of weapons systems while renewable energy technologies languish. Universities are flooded with military-related grants while they struggle to find money for environmental studies and the humanities.

Bridges, roads, levees, rail, ports, electric grids, sewage treatment plants and drinking water infrastructures are structurally  deficient and antiquated. Schools are in disrepair and  lack sufficient teachers and staff. Unable to stem the COVID-19 pandemic, the for-profit health care industry forces families, including those with insurance, into  bankruptcy. Domestic manufacturing, especially with the offshoring of jobs to China, Vietnam, Mexico and other nations, collapses. Families are drowning in personal debt, with 63 percent of Americans  living paycheck to paycheck. The poor, the mentally ill, the sick and the unemployed are abandoned.

Melman, who coined the term "permanent war economy," noted that since the end of the Second World War, the federal government has spent more than half its discretionary budget on past, current and future military operations. It is the largest single sustaining activity of the government. The military-industrial establishment is nothing more than gilded corporate welfare.

Military systems are sold before they are produced. Military industries are permitted to charge the federal government for huge cost overruns. Massive profits are guaranteed. For example, this November, the Army  awarded Raytheon Technologies alone more than $2 billion in  contracts, on top of over $190 million  awarded in August, to deliver missile systems to expand or replenish weapons sent to Ukraine.

Despite a depressed market for  most other businesses, stock prices of  Lockheed and  Northrop Grumman have risen by more than 36 and 50 percent this year.

Militarizing Tech Giants

Aerial view of Pentagon at night. (Joe Lauria)

Tech giants, including Amazon, which supplies surveillance and facial recognition software to the police and F.B.I., have been absorbed into the permanent war economy. Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Oracle were awarded multibillion-dollar cloud computing contracts for the Joint Warfighting Cloud Capability and are eligible to receive $9 billion in Pentagon contracts to  provide the military with "globally available cloud services across all security domains and classification levels, from the strategic level to the tactical edge," through mid-2028.

Foreign aid is given to countries  such as Israel, with  more than $150 billion in bilateral assistance since its founding in 1948, or Egypt, which has received  over $80 billion since 1978 - aid that requires foreign governments to buy weapons systems from the U.S. The U.S. public funds the research, development and building of weapons systems and purchases them for foreign governments.

Such a circular system mocks the idea of a free-market economy. These weapons soon become obsolete and are replaced by updated and usually more costly weapons systems. It is, in economic terms, a dead end. It  sustains nothing but the permanent war economy.

"The truth of the matter is that we're in a heavily militarized society driven by greed, lust for profit, and wars are being created just to keep fueling that," Kucinich told me.

In 2014, the U.S. backed a coup in Ukraine that installed a government that  included neo-Nazis and was antagonistic to Russia. The coup triggered a civil war when the ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine, the Donbass, sought to secede from the country, resulting in over 14,000 people dead and nearly 150,000 displaced, before Russia invaded in February.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine,  according to Jacques Baud, a former NATO security advisor who also worked for Swiss intelligence, was instigated by the escalation of Ukraine's war on the Donbass. It also followed the Biden administration's rejection of proposals  sent by the Kremlin in late 2021, which might have averted Russia's invasion the following year.

This invasion has led to widespread U.S. and E.U.  sanctions on Russia, which have  boomeranged onto Europe. Inflation ravages Europe with the sharp  curtailment of shipments of Russian oil and gas. Industry,  especially in Germany, is crippled. In most of Europe, it is a winter of shortages, spiraling prices and misery.

"This whole thing is blowing up in the face of the West," Kucinich warned. "We forced Russia to pivot to Asia, as well as Brazil, India, China, South Africa and Saudi Arabia. There's a whole new world being formed. The catalyst of it is the misjudgment that occurred about Ukraine and the effort to try to control Ukraine in 2014 that most people aren't aware of."

By not  opposing a Democratic Party whose primary business is war, liberals become the sterile, defeated dreamers in Fyodor Dostoevsky's Notes from the Underground.

A former convict, Dostoevsky did not fear evil. He feared a society that no longer had the moral fortitude to confront evil. And war, to steal a line from my  latest book, is the greatest evil.

Chris Hedges is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who was a foreign correspondent for 15 years for The New York Times, where he served as the Middle East bureau chief and Balkan bureau chief for the paper. He previously worked overseas for The Dallas Morning News, The Christian Science Monitor and NPR. He is the host of show "The Chris Hedges Report."

Author's Note to Readers: There is now no way left for me to continue to write a weekly column for ScheerPost and produce my weekly television show without your help.  The walls are closing in, with startling rapidity, on independent journalism, with the elites, including the Democratic Party elites, clamoring for more and more censorship. Bob Scheer, who runs ScheerPost on a shoestring budget, and I will not waiver in our commitment to independent and honest journalism, and we will never put ScheerPost behind a paywall, charge a subscription for it, sell your data or accept advertising. Please, if you can, sign up at  chrishedges.substack.com so I can continue to post my Monday column on ScheerPost and produce my weekly television show, The Chris Hedges Report.

 consortiumnews.com

 Commenter