When Will Everyone Notice a Mercenary Army of Occupation ?
October 27, 2026
Sometimes I bore myself: because what is so obvious to me, which I convey in messages I try to scream from various metaphorical rooftops, is often not obvious at all to many others; and then, history almost inevitably bears out my creepy, Cassandra-ish warnings.
I am bored by the heartbreaking impulse that I try to stifle, to say "I warned you" and "I told you so".
I am also saddened by the many times interviewers have praised my "prescience" - long after what was obviously about to happen has duly taken place.
No one wants to be right over and over about having predicted awful things, and I didn't opt for the role of wild-eyed Old Testament prophetess, hair continually aflame, roaming around the city walls screaming, "The end is near!"
But it is.
Since about 2022, I have been cautioning anyone who would listen, in every venue that would have me - and again I must credit Steve Bannon and his podcast WarRoom for having taken this seriously before anyone else would - that militias were being deployed into Europe. I also saw, during the Biden era, militias crossing North over our Southern border.
Maybe I am lucky in having reported in conflict areas around the world; and maybe I am lucky to have read a lot of history, just before the history books were censored or turned into right-on gibberish.
I have reported from formal war zones and from civil wars. I know what soldiers look like, and what combat looks like.
I have also reported from refugee camps. I know what genuine refugees look like.
For all of those reasons, I knew from the start that the narrative about "refugees" seeking "a better life" in Western Europe, Britain and the US (under the Biden administration), was hogwash.
How could everyone not see this right away?
Real refugees come with their families; as many others have noted, soldiers leave their families at home.
These hordes flooding in, via NGO, UN and Biden-era State Department sponsorship and these transnational entities' 360-degree management, as I reported in my 2024 essay What is a Culture? were and are overwhelmingly, military-age young men without families.
They hailed, and hail, disproportionately from notably violent, religiously extremist, tyrannical or failed states; thus they are sourced, bizarrely enough, unless the goal for the West is to import its own cultural and physical destruction, from countries that are not the traditional, constructive sources of immigration for Western nations. Someone is choosing the worst places on earth, from which to source new "Westerners".
I pointed out that many of these "refugees" arrived at the US Southern border from brutal, authoritarian Communist China - which transit involves CCP-level coordination to accomplish.
Afghanistan, another source of millions of recent "refugees" imported to the West, is a nation in which half of the population believes that it has the right to kidnap, beat, rape and hold hostage the other half of the population.
The numbers that total the arrival of Afghani "refugees" to the West, are staggering. A spigot is essentially draining a part of the population of Afghanistan and directing it Westward. About 300,000 Afghan "refugees" live now in the US; 515,000 in Germany, the largest concentration of such nationals in Europe. In Canada, 132,000 Afghanis have arrived; in the UK, 93,000; in France, 125,000; in Sweden, 68,000; and in Australia, 60,000. There are about 150,000 Afghanis in England and Wales.
So now there in total are about 928,000 Afghanis in the West.
The total population of Afghanistan is only 45,440,000. So Afghanistan has exported one in every 46 of its people to the West. Or: out of every 100 Afghanis, two plus are now living in the West.
And the proportions of Afghanis in the "host countries" is dramatic: almost one person in 300 in the US, for instance, is an Afghani "refugee". And I have called attention previously to the extraordinary fertility of Afghani people - a rate of childbirth that you can count on if your wife has no legal rights at all (that's not me talking, that's the UN) - and no access at all to a life outside of her subjugation to forced sex and forced reproduction:
I have spoken about the oddness that other recent main sources of "refugees" are the most violent of failed states: Somalia, for instance, has provided almost 260,000 "refugees" to the United States. Somalia's GDP was the second lowest in the world in 2020. It is typically ranked among the five lowest GDPs in the world. 7.7 million Somalis in Somalia, according to the UN, require humanitarian assistance. Somalia has seen a recent rise in violent extremism.
How do women do in Somalia ? "Somalia ranks fourth lowest for gender equality globally, maternal and infant mortality rates are some of the highest in the world, and early marriage is prevalent. The Somalia Health and Demographic Survey (SHDS) shows that Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) in women aged 15-49 is high, at 99.2%which has both short-term and long-term physiological, sexual and psychological repercussions. Sexual and Gender-Based Violence (GBV) is one of the most prevalent human rights violations faced by people, particularly women, all around the globe."
So: Somalia is a hellhole by objective NGO standards, and one that year upon year can't manage to create a functional economy, or to stop mutilating almost all of its girls and women.
However, it does contribute something: humans. According to Macrotrends.com, Somalia has one of the fastest growing populations in the world:
Ask why we are importing millions of people to the West, from two of the most brutal and oppressive, but most fertile, nations on the planet.
When 50-72,000 "migrants" invaded North African Spanish town of Ceuta on July 31, 2026 - in a move that was clearly, to me, a test run for later rampages which have now, three months later, taken place - the legacy media insisted that these were spontaneous population movements driven by "social media rumors".
Again, I read these headlines and thought, How can anyone believe this nonsense?
Legacy media described the men storming the beaches and flooding into the town of Ceuta, abusing women and girls as they congregated, as "Moroccans."
It took one glance to see that many if not most of these rioting, fighting-age men were obviously not Moroccans. They were visibly sub-Saharan Africans.
A very few reporters actually did journalism - that increasingly archaic practice - and asked some of the invading men, where they were from. Mali, Chad and Sudan were some of the replies that reporters received.
The reporters' curiosity ended there, though these replies made it clear to anyone paying attention that someone with money and resources had coordinated the movement of hundreds if not thousands of fighting-age men from those nations.
Chad, Mali and Sudan are many thousands of miles' journey to Morocco, let alone into Ceuta. How can a reporter not ask a followup question about this transcontinental movement?
From N'Djamena, Chad to Ceuta, Spain is 1807 nautical miles, or 3,503 driving miles; that is to say, it is almost the distance across the entire United States. You have to cross five borders to travel overland from Chad to Ceuta. Indeed legally you have to cross the Mediterranean into Spain, then take a ferry from Spain to Ceuta, located on the coast of North Africa. See Google Maps' directions:
A one-way ticket from Chad to Ceuta costs $590-$1200 USD. Again - this is important - legally you have to go to Malaga and enter from the Spain side. The average monthly income in Chad is about $300 USD. So a plane ticket to Ceuta would cost a couple of months' income for the average Chad national. To drive from Chad to Ceuta requires at least four days, and you would need an advance Canet de Passage en Duane or else multiple temporary import permits; you will be crossing active conflict areas, long stretches of desert, and border closings requiring massive detours. You will definitely need a modified 4×4 vehicle.
Did tens of thousands of nationals from four days' journey away, just decide all at once illegally to storm from Morocco into Spanish territory?
Some conditions you can face in driving across Chad, according to Lastplaces.com:
I think you get where I am going with this.
No Chad nationals, Sudanese or Malian nationals simply felt like up and spending two or three months' pay for a plane ticket, or scampering via automobile over five borders four days' journey across desert conditions and conflict areas into Morocco, there spontaneously to swim a barrier and get themselves unlawfully into Ceuta.
This movement of military-age men required meticulous and massive funding and planning, and it demanded movements across five nations; so these men arrived from Chad, Mali and Sudan either in private planes or in private equipped vehicles, facilitated by paperwork provided by transnational, deeply-funded and well-connected third parties.
Duh, as they say.
Am I the only person to whom these thundering problems in "the narrative" are not crushingly obvious?
Now we get to the burning of Europe, and the fact that in my view the UK and America are next.