14/11/2019 6 articles counterpunch.org  7min 🇬🇧 #164368

 Comment la Guerre Hybride contre la Bolivie a réussi à opérer un changement de régime

After Evo, the Lithium Question Looms Large in Bolivia

Photograph Source: Sámediggi Sametinget -  CC BY 2.0

Bolivia's President Evo Morales was overthrown in a military coup on November 10. He is now in Mexico. Before he left office, Morales had been involved in a long project to bring economic and social democracy to his long-exploited country. It is important to recall that Bolivia has suffered a series of coups, often conducted by the military and the oligarchy on behalf of transnational mining companies. Initially, these were tin firms, but tin is no longer the main target in Bolivia. The main target is its massive deposits of lithium, crucial for the electric car.

Over the past 13 years, Morales has tried to build a different relationship between his country and its resources. He has not wanted the resources to benefit the transnational mining firms, but rather to benefit his own population. Part of that promise was met as Bolivia's poverty rate has declined, and as Bolivia's population was able to improve its social indicators. Nationalization of resources combined with the use of its income to fund social development has played a role. The attitude of the Morales government toward the transnational firms produced a harsh response from them, many of them taking Bolivia to court.

Over the course of the past few years, Bolivia has struggled to raise investment to develop the lithium reserves in a way that brings the wealth back into the country for its people. Morales' Vice President Álvaro García Linera had said that lithium is the "fuel that will feed the world." Bolivia was unable to make deals with Western transnational firms; it decided to partner with Chinese firms. This made the Morales government vulnerable. It had walked into the new Cold War between the West and China. The coup against Morales cannot be understood without a glance at this clash.

Clash With the Transnational Firms

When Evo Morales and the Movement for Socialism took power in 2006, the government immediately sought to undo decades of theft by transnational mining firms. Morales' government seized several of the mining operations of the most powerful firms, such as Glencore, Jindal Steel & Power, Anglo-Argentine Pan American Energy, and South American Silver (now TriMetals Mining). It sent a message that business as usual was not going to continue.

Nonetheless, these large firms continued their operationsbased on older contractsin some areas of the country. For example, the Canadian transnational firm South American Silver had created a company in 2003before Morales came to powerto mine the Malku Khota for silver and indium (a rare earth metal used in flat-screen televisions). South American Silver then began to extend its reach into its concessions. The land that it claimed was inhabited by indigenous Bolivians, who argued that the company was destroying its sacred spaces as well as promoting an atmosphere of violence.

On August 1, 2012, the Morales governmentby Supreme Decree no. 1308annulled the contract with South American Silver (TriMetals Mining), which then sought international arbitration and compensation. Canada's government of Justin Trudeauas part of a broader pushon behalf of Canadian mining companies in South Americaput an immense amount of pressure on Bolivia. In August 2019, TriMetals struck a deal with the Bolivian government for $25.8 million, about a tenth of what it had earlier demanded as compensation.

Jindal Steel, an Indian transnational corporation, had an old contract to mine iron ore from Bolivia's El Mutún, a contract that was put on hold by the Morales government in 2007. In July 2012, Jindal Steel terminated the contract and sought international arbitration and compensation for its investment. In 2014, it won $22.5 million from Bolivia in a ruling from Paris-based International Chamber of Commerce. For another case against Bolivia, Jindal Steel demanded $100 million in compensation.

The Morales government seized three facilities from the Swiss-based transnational mining firm Glencore; these included a tin and zinc mine as well as two smelters. The mine's expropriation took place after Glencore's subsidiary clashed violently with miners.

Most aggressively, Pan American sued the Bolivian government for $1.5 billion for the expropriation of the Anglo-Argentinian company's stake in natural gas producer Chaco by the state. Bolivia settled for $357 million in 2014.

The scale of these payouts is enormous. It was  estimated in 2014 that the public and private payments made for nationalization of these key sectors amounted to at least $1.9 billion (Bolivia's GDP was at that time $28 billion).

In 2014, even the Financial Times  agreed that Morales' strategy was not entirely inappropriate. "Proof of the success of Morales's economic model is that since coming to power he  has tripled the size of the economy while ramping up record foreign reserves."

Lithium

Bolivia's key reserves are in lithium, which is essential for the electric car. Bolivia claims to have 70 percent of the world's lithium reserves, mostly in the Salar de Uyuni salt flats. The complexity of the mining and processing has meant that Bolivia has not been able to develop the lithium industry on its own. It requires capital, and it requires expertise.

The salt flat is about 12,000 feet (3,600 meters) above sea level, and it receives high rainfall. This makes it difficult to use sun-based evaporation. Such simpler solutions are available to Chile's Atacama Desert and in Argentina's Hombre Muerto. More technical solutions are needed for Bolivia, which means that more investment is needed.

The nationalization policy of the Morales government and the geographical complexity of Salar de Uyuni chased away several transnational mining firms. Eramet (France), FMC (United States) and Posco (South Korea) could not make deals with Bolivia, so they now operate in Argentina.

Morales made it clear that any development of the lithium had to be done with Bolivia's Comibolits national mining companyand Yacimientos de Litio Bolivianos (YLB)its national lithium companyas equal partners.

Last year, Germany's ACI Systems agreed to a deal with Bolivia. After protests from residents in the Salar de Uyuni region, Morales canceled that deal on November 4, 2019.

Chinese firmssuch as TBEA Group and China Machinery Engineeringmade a deal with YLB. It was being said that China's Tianqi Lithium Group, which operates in Argentina, was going to make a deal with YLB. Both Chinese investment and the Bolivian lithium company were experimenting with new ways to both mine the lithium and to share the profits of the lithium. The idea that there might be a new social compact for the lithium was unacceptable to the main transnational mining companies.

Tesla (United States) and Pure Energy Minerals (Canada) both showed great interest in having a direct stake in Bolivian lithium. But they could not make a deal that would take into consideration the parameters set by the Morales government. Morales himself was a direct impediment to the takeover of the lithium fields by the non-Chinese transnational firms. He had to go.

After the coup, Tesla's stock rose astronomically.

This article was produced by  Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

 counterpunch.org

Articles enfants plus récents en premier
22/11/2019 tlaxcala-int.org  18min #164864

 After Evo, the Lithium Question Looms Large in Bolivia

Bolivie : un coup d'État « pour le Christ » ou pour le gaz, le lithium, le cobalt, l'uranium, l'or, etc. ?

Achille Lollo

Tous les médias européens et usaméricains ont montré les images pathétiques de Luis Fernando Camacho et Jeanine Añez brandissant la Bible comme une arme, pour masquer et occulter la responsabilité du gouvernement des USA dans ce coup d'État.

La "présidente par intérim" Jeanine Añez, "l'Angelina Jolie bolivienne"(d'après le quotidien espagnol El Mundo)

Avant de parler de façon spécifique de la responsabilité de chacun dans le coup d'État, il est nécessaire de définir certains paramètres économiques et politiques du gouvernement d'Evo Morales, pour comprendre pourquoi, dans un pays aussi stable que la Bolivie - où le PIB est passé de 9 milliards de dollars US en 2007 à 40 milliards en 2018, tandis que l'inflation est descendue à 4,5 % et que la pauvreté est tombée de 38 % à 15 %, un coup d'État a été fomenté et mené à bien, alors que le Président Evo Morales avait annoncé que de nouvelles élections se tiendraient avant la fin de son mandat (22/01/2020), comme l'avaient demandé le secrétaire de l'OEA Luis Almagro et l'Union Européenne elle-même par la voix de Federica Mogherini.

16/11/2019 mondialisation.ca  15min #164531

 After Evo, the Lithium Question Looms Large in Bolivia

La Bolivie n'existe pas

Pour bien comprendre ce qu'est en réalité le capitalisme dit « vert » sous ses apparences de vertu, cet article est à mettre en parallèle avec ceux de Cory Morningstar. Vous trouverez des liens sur les six volets de son enquête dans l'introduction de son premier article : La fabrication de Greta Thunberg - pour consentement, acte I 

Parce qu'il est indispensable à la nouvelle économie « verte », le lithium est un nouvel or noir, et la Bolivie est en train d'en faire les frais.

14/11/2019 mondialisation.ca  6min #164419

 After Evo, the Lithium Question Looms Large in Bolivia

La révolution du lithium. Tesla serait-il derrière le renversement de Morales?

Le coup d'Etat en Bolivie intervient moins d'une semaine après la fin des négociations entre Evo Morales, le président de la Bolivie obligé de quitter son pays, et une firme multinationale exploitant le lithium.

La Bolivie a des gisements de lithium qui permettent de fabriquer des batteries comme celles utilisées dans les voitures électriques. Le coup d'Etat, qui a conduit dimanche à la démission d'Evo Morales et poussé le président à se réfugier au Mexique, est officiellement le fruit du résultat de journées de protestations du fait d'éléments de la droite en colère contre le gouvernement de gauche d'Evo Morales.

14/11/2019 strategic-culture.org  7min 🇬🇧 #164406

 After Evo, the Lithium Question Looms Large in Bolivia

The Bolivian Coup Comes Down to One Precious Mineral

Vijay PRASHAD

Bolivia's President Evo Morales was overthrown in a military coup on November 10. He is now in Mexico. Before he left office, Morales had been involved in a long project to bring economic and social democracy to his long-exploited country. It is important to recall that Bolivia has suffered a series of coups, often conducted by the military and the oligarchy on behalf of transnational mining companies.

14/11/2019 reseauinternational.net  5min #164384

 After Evo, the Lithium Question Looms Large in Bolivia

Le coup d'État en Bolivie intervient moins d'une semaine après la fin des négociations entre Morales et une multinationale allemande de commercialisation du lithium

par Eoin Higgins.

« Le lithium de la Bolivie appartient au peuple bolivien. Pas aux compagnies multinationales«.

Le coup d'État militaire de dimanche en Bolivie a mis en place un gouvernement qui devrait renverser la décision du président démissionnaire Evo Morales d'annuler un accord avec une société allemande pour le développement de gisements de lithium dans ce pays d'Amérique latine pour des batteries comme celles des voitures électriques..